the strange beauty of logical positivism and popular and academic misconceptions about it
There are two common misconceptions about logical positivism. 1. the positivists, like New Atheists, set out to prove that non scientific theories like religion and metaphysics, are false and only science can be true, and 2. Logical positivism fails at its own criterion of meaningfulness. (1) has got LP backwards. LP views religions and metaphysical systems as not just true, but necessarily true, while it's the scientific theories that are possibly false, not necessarily true at all. That's the strange beauty of LP. The difference they draw between theories is not between the true or the false, but "meaningful" and "not meaningful", using a peculiar definition of "meaning". The challenge of unpacking their use of "meaning" such that it isn't circular is the reason for (2). (2) is flatly false. Apply LP to LP and it verifies. (2) also assumes that LP is a theory and not either a definition or description or an axiomatic system or me...